Mass media violating civil rights

0
288
25 6
25 6

The United States Constitution is designed to protect the civil rights of the people like dangal meaning in english. It ensures that all citizens have a voice and power in government, and it guarantees certain rights, such as free speech.

Some mass media outlets are blatantly violating the civil rights guaranteed by our constitution while trying to report “the news”. Media executives are using their platforms in some cases to encourage violence against protesters at political events. More importantly, they’re ignoring violations of other civil rights, including due process for all suspected criminals.

1. Violating the First Amendment

Those who incite protest, such as through e-mails or Facebook posts, are violating the civil rights of others. They’re encouraging groupthink and violent behavior by those who would protest at the events. Media executives and reporters who have encouraged violence or have posted inaccurate information about protesters and their beliefs could be held liable for inciting violence against these people and groups.

2. Violating due process

A fundamental right given to all in our constitution is due process. Citizens are declared guilty by media outlets and politicians without a trial or hearing to determine their guilt in cases involving bribery, corruption, sexual misconduct or rape while in office. These cases occur frequently.

3. Violating the presumption of innocence

Many protesters at the recent Republican and Democratic national conventions were falsely accused on television and in early morning newspaper reports as being “violent” or “anarchists”. These lies were often spread with no motive or evidence to back them up, yet many of the accused are now being arrested and charged with crimes.

4. Abusing confidentiality

Confidentiality is a basic protection for citizens against harassment by government agencies and also protects witnesses in trials and investigations into crimes, such as bribery or corruption. Confidentiality also protects religious leaders and whistleblowers whose jobs would be at risk if the public knew about their wrongdoing.

Media outlets, both print and broadcast, should be enforcing confidentiality rules to protect the privacy of individuals as well as protecting their jobs. They’d lose business if they did so.

Media executives who attempt to violate these constitutional rights could be held liable for damages resulting from their actions. Victims could claim that they were harmed by having false information distributed during a national political convention. Many protesters who were falsely accused of being “anarchists” or “violent” are now being arrested under state laws making it illegal to wear body armor or concealed weapons at a political event without a permit or justification of probable cause.

5. Violating the First Amendment again

Because reporters were complicit in spreading lies about protesters and some of their organizations, they are also violating the First Amendment rights of others who reported honestly on these groups and their efforts.

Media outlets should not allow reporters to report any material that they know is false or misleading. At the same time, victims should be allowed to bring civil suits against organizations that continue to report false information about them without a reasonable effort to verify that information. 

6. Violating the sixth amendment

Another right given in our constitution is due process of law in a court of law as opposed to through an executive branch agency or other authority issuing an arrest warrant. Media outlets should not engage in unlawful acts to arrest protesters. The executive branch should follow the law and use the proper channels for arresting persons who break federal and state laws.

7. Violating the fifth amendment

Victims have the right to remain silent in court cases, which also protects them from false testimony by others during investigations. The Fifth Amendment also protects citizens from having evidence against themselves used against them at trial as well as from having their rights violated by others through false testimony that is used against them.

The media should not publish false information about protesters or any other citizens. They have the right to protect their private property and ensure that it is not damaged. 

8. Violating the eighth amendment”

Some media outlets have published inaccurate information about prisoners, including their names and photographs, which violates the Eighth Amendment’s protection from cruel and unusual punishment.

In conclusion, media executives who are spreading lies about individuals who may be innocent of any wrongdoing should be held liable for damages caused by their actions. Victims also have a right to sue for libel against news organizations that publish false information about them.

9. Violating the fifth amendment

In some cases, protesters have been arrested with no proof that they have committed a crime, not even probable cause. In other cases, journalists who reported on protests were falsely accused of being “anarchists” and “violent” without any evidence to back up that claim.

Victims also have a right to sue for false arrest and imprisonment as well as for unlawful searches and seizures. They may be able to recover damages for their attorney’s fees, too. 

10. Violating the fourth amendment

Media outlets are protecting the identities of police officers accused of brutality or rape without due process by releasing their names without verification and in violation of union rules or regulations against releasing them to the public.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here